Iran is willing to resume atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.
The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.
The foreign minister is treading a complex route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.
He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.
The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader claiming the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states used their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.
Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.
It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted three times they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".
Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.
Trump in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet getting clear proposals from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.
In his speech to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.
Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence challenging to restore.
The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to enforce their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the primary answer to resolve disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."
"If they address to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the same tone."
In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."
He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the face of this invasion."
Tech enthusiast and smart home expert, dedicated to simplifying innovative living.